|
|
Post by Sideshow Bob on Dec 1, 2011 8:49:38 GMT -6
Here's the original ESPN.com story... espn.go.com/dallas/nba/story/_/id/7300682/tyson-chandler-dallas-mavericks-says-expects-a-new-team-come-training-campIn a surprise development on the first day that NBA teams and agents could start talking about new contracts, Tyson Chandler came away convinced that his time with the Dallas Mavericks is coming to an end.
"I really think I'm going to be on a new team come training camp," Chandler told ESPN.com in a telephone interview Wednesday night. "I'm really taking a hard look at all of my options, trying to see what best suits me."
Chandler's doubts about the Mavericks' willingness to re-sign him to a lucrative long-term deal are bound to be welcome news for the teams already courting him in these early stages of free agency. Chandler and Denver center Nene rank as the two most coveted unrestricted free agents in the 2011 class, but the overwhelming sentiment in many front offices has been that Chandler's return to Dallas was essentially a lock after the 7-footer's role in helping the Mavericks win their first championship.
Chandler, though, insisted Wednesday that such assumptions are a misnomer and admitted for the first time that he's disappointed by the club's decision not to offer him a contract extension after he was widely credited -- most notably by Mavericks star Dirk Nowitzki -- for changing the team's defensive culture after three first-round exits in the previous four years.
Chandler maintains that staying in Dallas has always been his first choice, but he expressed disappointment that the communication between the sides was minimal from the end of the NBA Finals in mid-June and the June 30 deadline for extensions. On Wednesday, when teams and agents were allowed to commence free-agent negotiations, NBA front office sources listed New Jersey, Golden State, Houston and Toronto as the teams chasing Chandler hardest.
The Mavericks have likewise long maintained that bringing Chandler back is their No. 1 offseason priority and that they were reluctant to talk about an extension before July 1 because no one knew how drastic changes to the NBA's collective bargaining agreement would be at that time.
But sources with knowledge of club's thinking have told ESPN.com this month that management does fear that trying to match the offers Chandler gets on the open market -- even if Dallas' other free agents, such as Caron Butler and J.J. Barea are all let go -- will only leave them with about $5-to-$6 million in salary-cap space in the summer of 2012.
That's when the Mavericks had hoped to be under the cap for the first time in the Mark Cuban era to join the free agent bidding for Dwight Howard, Chris Paul and Dallas-area native Deron Williams.
As one of the league's oldest teams and with Nowitzki as its lone certifiable All-Star, Dallas knows it has to start looking to the future by trying to find a younger cornerstone player -- like Williams -- who can help the 33-year-old transition to more of a co-starring role. The Mavs' big quandary, however, is that the presence of Nowitzki on the roster in July 2012 without Chandler as his frontcourt sidekick might not be enough to tempt the league's top free agents.
One source close to Williams, for example, says it's unlikely that the New Jersey Nets' point guard would consider signing with the Mavericks unless he was joining both Nowitzki and Chandler. The Mavs, though, privately worry that, with Nowitzki and Chandler on the books, they won't have enough money to compete for Williams or Howard outright and would be forced to rely on acquiring one of those stars through a complicated sign-and-trade arrangement.
Chandler, for his part, says he hopes to know where his home will be soon, even though the league announced Tuesday that teams and players can't strike written or verbal agreements before the officially scheduled start of free agency on Dec. 9.
"I would like this to be settled by early next week," Chandler said. "I want to be in camp with my new teammates as soon as possible."
Cuban could not be immediately reached to respond to Chandler's comments. Earlier Wednesday, Cuban told ESPNDallas.com's Jeff Caplan: "We are going through and digesting all the new rules and waiting on others. Once everything is in place we will have a far better idea on what we can and can't do. In the meanwhile, we certainly are going to be talking to everyone's agent."
Chandler, 29, was acquired by the Mavericks in July 2010 in a deal with the Charlotte Bobcats co-headlined by Erick Dampier, but he was widely billed at the time as a consolation prize after Dampier's cap-friendly contract failed to get Dallas in the bidding for the league's marquee free agents -- Miami stars LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh among them -- through various sign-and-trade offers.
Yet Chandler wound up meshing with Nowitzki better than anyone anticipated, supplying length, athleticism, rim protection and a brand of vocal leadership that no big man who previously lined up alongside the eventual NBA Finals MVP had ever provided in Dallas.
Chandler wound up playing in 74 regular season games -- after missing nearly 70 games over the previous two seasons through injury -- and finished third in the league's Defensive Player of the Year voting. In the Western Conference finals, Chandler helped Dallas to a 4-1 series win over the same Oklahoma City Thunder team that traded for him in February 2009 and then rescinded the trade one day later because of concerns about a toe injury. |
|
|
|
Post by Terd Ferguson on Dec 1, 2011 8:50:33 GMT -6
posturing...you'd think after how the lockout went, players (and agents) would know this kind of thing isn't helpful.
Either he will end up in Dallas, or we will replace him with another star (Howard? Nene?). The one that may leave is Caron, although if he does I think Grant Hill is a likely replacement.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sideshow Bob on Dec 1, 2011 8:51:22 GMT -6
posturing...you'd think after how the lockout went, players (and agents) would know this kind of thing isn't helpful. Either he will end up in Dallas, or we will replace him with another star (Howard? Nene?). The one that may leave is Caron, although if he does I think Grant Hill is a likely replacement. I actually have heard rumors about the Spurs being interested in Caron. Not sure how I feel about that. |
|
|
|
Post by Terd Ferguson on Dec 1, 2011 8:54:59 GMT -6
From Mike Fisher:
DONUT 9: Tyson says he thinks he won't be back in Dallas! He says he is interested in going to the Nets! Dwight Howard is rumors to like the Mavs! Caron hints that he likes the Heat!
Truth: Tyson is using the Nets. Dwight is using the Mavs. Caron is using the Heat. It's the game of free agency. Dont panic, folks.
Now, I don't offer than as an assurance that TY is staying. And when Tyson says, "I really think I'm going to be on a new team come training camp," I'm not denying that's a bit earth-shaking.
Truthfully, if Golden State or New Jersey has already told him they'll give him a max deal
-- meaning, like, $17 mil a year to put him on a level with LeBron, Wade, Kobe and Dirk -- he probably will be on a new team come training camp.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terd Ferguson on Dec 1, 2011 8:56:53 GMT -6
posturing...you'd think after how the lockout went, players (and agents) would know this kind of thing isn't helpful. Either he will end up in Dallas, or we will replace him with another star (Howard? Nene?). The one that may leave is Caron, although if he does I think Grant Hill is a likely replacement. I actually have heard rumors about the Spurs being interested in Caron. Not sure how I feel about that. Remember last year early in the year when he was healthy, the Mavs were easily the most dominant team in the NBA. Every team that had a long winning streak, we broke it. Caron was a big part of that. He is good, but I think Grant Hill is a savvy veteran defender who can still bury the mid-range J and is an excellent passer. He might actually be a better fit for us, and we could probably get him for 2 yrs and $6M. |
|
|
|
Post by mexicanjunior on Dec 1, 2011 9:23:13 GMT -6
posturing...you'd think after how the lockout went, players (and agents) would know this kind of thing isn't helpful. Either he will end up in Dallas, or we will replace him with another star (Howard? Nene?). The one that may leave is Caron, although if he does I think Grant Hill is a likely replacement. I actually have heard rumors about the Spurs being interested in Caron. Not sure how I feel about that. I would not want to spend that much money on a guy that we have young players in position to take over SG/SF. James Anderson and Kawhi Leonard should have those positions locked down while we still have Manu and (unfortunately) still stuck with Jefferson. If we are going to spend money, it needs to be on front court help. We need to use amnesty on that idiotic Jefferson contract and sign someone in the Tyson Chandler mold. Duncan needs front court help, it was the #1 reason why we lost to the effing Grizzlies last year, Gasol and Randolph KILLED us in the post... |
|
|
|
Post by Terd Ferguson on Dec 1, 2011 9:43:40 GMT -6
Ok, here is the deal I'll make you.
Mavs send Haywood and Butler (S&T) to Spurs.
Spurs send Parker and McDyess (who can be cut and boomerang back to SA if you want) to Nets.
Nets send Deron Williams to Dallas.
We get our new star. The Nets get real value for Deron Williams who is a FA next year. The Spurs get the big they need (Haywood) and a SF to bridge the gap to Leonard until he is ready.
|
|
|
|
Post by mexicanjunior on Dec 1, 2011 10:35:44 GMT -6
Ok, here is the deal I'll make you. Mavs send Haywood and Butler (S&T) to Spurs. Spurs send Parker and McDyess (who can be cut and boomerang back to SA if you want) to Nets. Nets send Deron Williams to Dallas. We get our new star. The Nets get real value for Deron Williams who is a FA next year. The Spurs get the big they need (Haywood) and a SF to bridge the gap to Leonard until he is ready. I would need more than Haywood and Butler for Parker. Plus, with George Hill gone, we no longer have anyone to replace him. I think we end up keeping him until his new contract expires. |
|
|
|
Post by Terd Ferguson on Dec 1, 2011 10:39:05 GMT -6
I thought you were tired of Parker.
We can throw some first rounders at it...maybe even give you Roddy.
|
|
|
|
Post by mexicanjunior on Dec 1, 2011 10:41:41 GMT -6
I thought you were tired of Parker. We can throw some first rounders at it...maybe even give you Roddy. I am tired of Parker and, if we still had Hill, I would consider the package with a first rounder next year thrown in. Unfortunately, we have no one behind Parker anymore, Manu will probably be the backup PG next year unless we sign someone. |
|
|
|
Post by Sideshow Bob on Dec 1, 2011 11:01:48 GMT -6
I thought you were tired of Parker. We can throw some first rounders at it...maybe even give you Roddy. i take that deal |
|
|
|
Post by Terd Ferguson on Dec 1, 2011 11:02:20 GMT -6
Celtics are open to dealing Rondo (for Paul, but he won't sign there). You could trade them Parker for Rondo but you'd have to throw in more....might not make it worth it for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sideshow Bob on Dec 1, 2011 11:02:22 GMT -6
I thought you were tired of Parker. We can throw some first rounders at it...maybe even give you Roddy. I am tired of Parker and, if we still had Hill, I would consider the package with a first rounder next year thrown in. Unfortunately, we have no one behind Parker anymore, Manu will probably be the backup PG next year unless we sign someone. i'll bet we pick up someone like supernintendo chalmers |
|
|
|
Post by Terd Ferguson on Dec 1, 2011 11:02:51 GMT -6
Chalmers will stay with Miami...why would he leave that?
|
|
|
|
Post by mexicanjunior on Dec 1, 2011 11:13:19 GMT -6
Celtics are open to dealing Rondo (for Paul, but he won't sign there). You could trade them Parker for Rondo but you'd have to throw in more....might not make it worth it for you. I would do Rondo for Parker + Blair. |
|
