|
|
Post by Sideshow Bob on Feb 15, 2011 16:25:58 GMT -6
that is a kick to my ballsack every time i see it I see it kind of the same way I see .4...would hurt 1000 times more if the Mavs actually won the title... all that matters to me is that, in both instances, the spurs DIDN'T (and if not for each shot, they WOULD HAVE) |
|
|
|
Post by mexicanjunior on Feb 15, 2011 16:33:37 GMT -6
I see it kind of the same way I see .4...would hurt 1000 times more if the Mavs actually won the title... all that matters to me is that, in both instances, the spurs DIDN'T (and if not for each shot, they WOULD HAVE) I dunno, NBA might have done us the same way they did the Mavs with the refs in 2006...I think we would have had a better chance with the Pistons in 2004. |
|
|
|
Post by Terd Ferguson on Feb 15, 2011 18:44:07 GMT -6
all that matters to me is that, in both instances, the spurs DIDN'T (and if not for each shot, they WOULD HAVE) I dunno, NBA might have done us the same way they did the Mavs with the refs in 2006...I think we would have had a better chance with the Pistons in 2004. That may be true...budding superstar gets his shot and the NBA didn't like that after 2 1/2 games it was looking like a sweep, and then out came the whistles. |
|
